Hi, On Wed 22-07-15 17:05:28, Shilong Wang wrote: > 2015-05-26 15:51 GMT+08:00 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>: > > > Hello, > > > > this is the second version of support for orphan file feature in > > e2fsprogs. > > Since v1, I have finished and debugged e2fsck support, fixed a couple of > > issues > > in mke2fs and tune2fs and also incorporated changes resulting from the > > review. > > The only unresolved issue I'm aware of is which reserved inode will we use > > for > > this feature. > > > > If nobody speaks up, I will pick up patches from Konstantin to support > > increasing number of reserved inodes (he implemented it in resize2fs, I > > will > > move it to tune2fs by moving some resize2fs functionality to libext2fs). > > That > > will practically remove the current limitation of the number of reserved > > inodes. > > > > > Any progress about this? More reserved inodes are also needed by project > quota. > BTW, i noticed if i extend s_first_ino, many e2fsprogs tests will fail > because > tests results reiled on previous confirmed system inodes, any idea about > this? Yes, I'm working on this on-and-off for some time. I already have separated functionality to move blocks and to move inodes from resize2fs into libext2fs. So the hardest part is hopefully done. But it needs testing and I need to figure out whether some group accounting parts also don't need to be moved into libext2fs as they may be needed in more places. So overall it's about one or two days of work to finish this but I get preempted by other stuff... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
