Hello, I've noticed that you've implemented enabling 64-bit mode of a filesystem in resize2fs. That is quite logical from the implementation point of view however IMHO it doesn't make too much sense from user point of view. I'd rather expect that functionality to be in tune2fs. So shouldn't we rather abstract the code into a separate library that would be linked to both resize2fs and tune2fs? Alternatively we could just make tune2fs call resize2fs with appropriate options. I'm asking because I'm now looking into implementing increasing number of reserved inodes. For that we may need to move some inodes and it would be natural to use code from resize2fs for that. But adding that as an option to resize2fs is just unintuitive from user point of view so I'd like to have some concensus on how we do this... Darrick, Ted, any opinion? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
