Is there any reason for us to use EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It looks to me like EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS includes the credits
neede to set up the quota records.  So if we move the call to
dquot_initialize(inode) outside of the normal transaction (which we
should probably do in all cases), that means that we shouldn't ever
need to use EXT4_MAX_QUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS.  Is that right?

The reason why I ask is the following is a easy way to trigger a file
system problem:

mke2fs -Fq -t ext4 -b 4096 /dev/vdc 50M
mount -t ext4 -o usrquota,grpquota /dev/vdc
l8=12345678
l16=$l8$l8
l32=$l16$l16
l64=$l32$l32
dmesg -n 7
ln -s $l64 /vdc/link

This will result in:

[    5.229165] JBD2: ln wants too many credits (156 > 128)
[    5.230194] EXT4-fs error (device vdc) in __ext4_new_inode:843: error 28

In other places where we are allocating a new inode (such as mknod),
we're doing the following:

	credits = EXT4_DATA_TRANS_BLOCKS(dir->i_sb) +
			EXT4_INDEX_EXTRA_TRANS_BLOCKS + 3;

Which is 37 blocks, and I suspect that's still too darned much.  But
if we don't need to use EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS in ext4_mknod(), we
shouldn't be needing it in ext4_symlink(), either.

Am I missing anything?

Thanks,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux