Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary lock/unlock of i_block_reservation_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:

> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:11:44 +0100
> From: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: tytso@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary lock/unlock of
>     i_block_reservation_lock
> 
> This is a leftover of commit 71d4f7d032149b935a26eb3ff85c6c837f3714e1

Ah yes, seems we're only now finding missing leftovers from that
commit :)

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
-Lukas

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/balloc.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 83a6f49..2072c70 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -641,8 +641,6 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  	 * fail EDQUOT for metdata, but we do account for it.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(*errp) && (flags & EXT4_MB_DELALLOC_RESERVED)) {
> -		spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> -		spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
>  		dquot_alloc_block_nofail(inode,
>  				EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), ar.len));
>  	}
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux