Re: [v9 1/5] vfs: adds general codes to enforces project quota limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 17-03-15 08:49:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:29:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 11-03-15 12:03:19, Li Xi wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for a new quota type PRJQUOTA for project quota
> > > enforcement. Also a new method get_projid() is added into dquot_operations
> > > structure.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Li Xi <lixi@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > ...
> > > diff --git a/fs/quota/quota.c b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > > index 2aa4151..c76b350 100644
> > > --- a/fs/quota/quota.c
> > > +++ b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > > @@ -30,11 +30,15 @@ static int check_quotactl_permission(struct super_block *sb, int type, int cmd,
> > >  	case Q_XGETQSTATV:
> > >  	case Q_XQUOTASYNC:
> > >  		break;
> > > -	/* allow to query information for dquots we "own" */
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * allow to query information for dquots we "own"
> > > +	 * always allow querying project quota
> > > +	 */
> > >  	case Q_GETQUOTA:
> > >  	case Q_XGETQUOTA:
> > >  		if ((type == USRQUOTA && uid_eq(current_euid(), make_kuid(current_user_ns(), id))) ||
> > > -		    (type == GRPQUOTA && in_egroup_p(make_kgid(current_user_ns(), id))))
> > > +		    (type == GRPQUOTA && in_egroup_p(make_kgid(current_user_ns(), id))) ||
> > > +		    (type == PRJQUOTA))
> > >  			break;
> >   I wanted to merge this patch but this hunk caught my eye. Why do we
> > suddently allow querying of project quotas? Traditionally that has been
> > allowed only with CAP_SYS_ADMIN. I agree it looks too restrictive to me but
> > unless that's a bug, I think we have to adhere to original behavior and
> > drop this hunk. Dave, was that behavior of project quotas intended? 
> 
> This is for quota reports, right?
  Yes.

> Project quotas are managed by the administrator as individual users
> may not even have access to all the files under a project and hence
> often cannot do anything about running out of quota space. i.e. users
> don't own project quotas like they "own" user and group quotas.
> user/group quotas imply the user has permission to access/modify the
> files within the quota, whereas that is not true of project quotas.
> 
> e.g. Think about a project that compartmentalises information along
> user acess bounds: even if a user can't access parts of the project
> quota space, allowing them to query the accounting of space used by
> the project is leaking information about how much data there is in
> the project they can't access....
  OK, thanks for the explanation. So Q_GETQUOTA and Q_XGETQUOTA for
PRJQUOTA have to stay for CAP_SYS_ADMIN capable processes only (at least
for now).

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux