Re: Ext4 tail merging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Ext4 still does not support tail merging right?  I had a user post
> this filefrag output and was surprised to see that it says the merged
> flag is set.  How can this be?
> 
> $ filefrag -v /boot/grub/grubenv
> Filesystem type is: ef53
> Filesystem cylinder groups approximately 19
> File size of /boot/grub/grubenv is 1024 (1 block of 4096 bytes)
> ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
>   0: 0.. 0: 494592.. 494592: 1: merged,eof
> /boot/grub/grubenv: 1 extent found, perfection would be -1 extent

"merged" in this context doesn't mean "tail merging" in the sense of Reiserfs.  This just means that the reported "extent" is actually merged
from a series of contiguous blocks in an ext3 block-mapped file (as
opposed to an extent-mapped file).

Note that there is an experimental ext4 feature similar to "tail merging"
that is being added.  That is "inline data", which stores the data of
small files or directories directly in the inode as an xattr.

Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux