Am 26.11.2014 um 21:26 schrieb Jan Kara: > On Wed 26-11-14 16:11:37, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> Am 26.11.2014 um 09:25 schrieb Jan Kara: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed 26-11-14 09:06:43, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >>>> i'm still getting a lot of those call traces: >>>> " >>>> Call Trace: >>>> [<ffffffffa01d7006>] ext4_es_lru_add+0x26/0x80 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffffa01d7286>] ext4_es_insert_extent+0x96/0x100 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffffa01c3fd3>] ? ext4_find_delalloc_range+0x23/0x60 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffffa019b781>] ext4_map_blocks+0x111/0x450 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffffa019d167>] _ext4_get_block+0x87/0x190 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffffa019d2c6>] ext4_get_block+0x16/0x20 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffff8117f73f>] generic_block_bmap+0x3f/0x50 >>>> [<ffffffffa013f4ae>] ? jbd2_journal_file_buffer+0x4e/0x80 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffff810f6242>] ? mapping_tagged+0x12/0x20 >>>> [<ffffffffa019ad71>] ext4_bmap+0x91/0xf0 [ext4] >>>> [<ffffffff811686de>] bmap+0x1e/0x30 >>>> [<ffffffffa0148063>] jbd2_journal_bmap+0x33/0xb0 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffffa014831d>] jbd2_journal_next_log_block+0x7d/0x90 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffffa0140238>] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x7f8/0x1ae0 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffff81084e13>] ? idle_balance+0xd3/0x110 >>>> [<ffffffff8105a018>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.35+0x38/0x70 >>>> [<ffffffffa014593a>] kjournald2+0xba/0x230 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffff81070360>] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 >>>> [<ffffffffa0145880>] ? jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode+0x130/0x130 [jbd2] >>>> [<ffffffff8106fb60>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 >>>> [<ffffffff8106faa0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x130/0x130 >>>> [<ffffffff81554c2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 >>>> [<ffffffff8106faa0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x130/0x130 >>>> " >>>> >>>> Is there any chance to fix them in vanilla 3.10.61? >>> Ted is just testing patches to fix these. You are welcome if you can give >>> them a try as well (tarball attached). I'm not sure patches will be >>> backported as far as to 3.10-stable but when the patches get some testing >>> in mainline, I'll be porting them to 3.12-stable for our enterprise >>> kernel... >> >> OK i tried to port them to 3.10 but it seems i can't handle this. There >> are so many differences. Are there any workarounds possible? Currently >> the 3.10 kernel is also completely crashing with this backtrace. > No workarounds I'm aware of. Sorry. When I have patches for 3.12, you can > try porting them to 3.10. That should be an easier task... > > Honza those patches work absolutely fine on a 3.16 kernel. Do you have any idea, when your 3.12 backport is done? Thanks! Greets, Stefan Priebe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
