Re: [PATCH] jbd2: fix regression where we fail to initialize checksum seed when loading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:22:23PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> When we're enabling journal features, we cannot use the predicate
> jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3() because we haven't yet set the sb
> feature flag fields!  Moreover, we just finished loading the shash
> driver, so the test is unnecessary; calculate the seed always.
> 
> Without this patch, we fail to initialize the checksum seed the first
> time we turn on journal_checksum, which means that all journal blocks
> written during that first mount are corrupt.  Transactions written
> after the second mount will be fine, since the feature flag will be
> set in the journal superblock.  xfstests generic/{034,321,322} are the
> regression tests.
> 
> (This is important for 3.18.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.  I've confirmed this has fixed the xfstests
regressions, and I'll be sending this to Linus shortly.

	     	      	 	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux