Re: [dm-devel] Some thoughts about providing data block checksumming for ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> > Recovery after a power fail
> > ---------------------------
> > 
> > If the dm-protected device was not cleanly shut down, then we need to
> > examine all of the checksum blocks in the Active Area.  For each
> > checksum block in the AA, the checksums for all of their data blocks
> > should machine either the checksum found in the AA, or the checksum
> > found in the checksum block in the checksum group.
> 
> ... and if the checksum of the block matches BOTH the checksum in the AA 
> and the checksum in the checksum group (because of checksum function 
> collision), you don't know which 4-bit nibble belongs to the data in the 
> block.

Though, I realize that you could avoid this problem by selecting the 
appropriate checksum function - that never results in collision if the 
4-bit nibble differs.

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux