Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 bug fixes for 3.18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Theodore Ts'o (1):
>       jbd2: use a better hash function for the revoke table

Does it really make sense to use hash_u64()? It can be quite expensive
(mainly on 32-bit targets), and since the low bits are where all the
information is anyway, I'd suggest using hash_32() here even if the
block number in theory can have a few bits above the 32-bit mark.

Anyway, pulled, but I just reacted to that small detail.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux