On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:31:13PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote: > Another option I thought of I'd like to get formally rejected would be > to consider all future hashes unsigned, so there's a +3 offset between > the on-disk value and the ext2fs_dirhash parameter. I'm fine with considering all future hashes to be unsigned; let's see how messy it actually makes the source code. Cheers, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
