Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: track extent status tree shrinker delay statictics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:10:48PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >   When reading through this again, I realized that we probably don't want
> > this file in /proc/fs/ext4 but rather in /sys/kernel/debug/ext4 because
> > it's really a debugging interface and we don't want any tools to start
> > using it.
> 
> Fair enough.  I will fix it in next version.

I was actually OK with leaving it in /proc, since we have a number of
other debugging files in /proc/fs/ext4/<dev> already, and I'm not sure
spreading ext4's foot print so that we have some files in /proc, some
in /sys, and some in debugfs is worth decreasing the possibility that
some tool would start depending on the contents of that file --- I
can't really imagine why non-fs developers would ever care about such
statistics.

I probably *would* be in favor of creating a new config option which
disables /proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/mballoc_groups and
/proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/es_shrinker_info, to help with the people who care
shrinking the total footprint of the Linux kernel for embedded
application (kernel tinification), though.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux