On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:30:33PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Hum, is this really such a win? Unlike __process_buffer(), this function > is well separated so IMHO the code is better readable before the folding. I agree it's a closer call. I'm not wedded to folding in __wait_cp_io. I was reacting more to the fact that the comment right before the call to __wait_cp_io was horribly misleading, and when I looked to confirm what I thought __wait_cp_io() was doing, it looked like another static function used in exactly one place that could be folded in. If other folks think that it's more readable w/o this patch, I'm happy to drop it. Anyone else have an opinion? Cheers, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
