On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:47:10AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > No. patch was written like this from very beginning. > By logic is follows. We must update i_disksize in the same transaction > Before the patch i_disksize was updated only if requested range was fully completed. > But we also have to update it in case of error. And patch fix what. Ok, I'll update the commit description to make it clear that what we're fixing is on the error path. Thanks!! - Ted P.S. I haven't forgotten about your 1/5 patch; I'm just currently prioritizing patches that will get pushed to Linus during the current development cycle. I'll do a second pass for cleanup and new feature commits (i.e., things that aren't stable kernel fodder) after I push fixes to Linus for -rc3. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
