Re: [PATCH 4/5] fix transaction issues for ext4_fallocate and ext_zero_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> After commit f282ac19d86f we use different transactions for preallocation
> and i_disksize update which result in complain from fsck after power-failure.
> spotted by generic/019. IMHO this is regression because fs becomes inconsistent,
> even more 'e2fsck -p' will no longer works (which drives admins go crazy)
> Same transaction requirement applies ctime,mtime updates
> 
> testcase: xfstest generic/019
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux