Re: e2fsck readahead speedup performance report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:56:46PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Interesting results!
> 
> I noticed that the 1TB SSD did seem to suffer when you went from
> multi-threaded to single-threaded.  Was this a SATA-attached or
> USB-attached SSD?  And any insights about why the SSD seemed to
> require threading for better performance when using readaead?

PCIE, and it might simply be having issues. :/

One thing I haven't looked into is how exactly the kernel maps IO
requests to queue slots -- does each CPU get its own pile of slots to
use up?  I _think_ it does, but it's been a few months since I poked
at mq.  Hmm... max_sectors_kb=128, which isn't unusually odd.  Guess
I'll keep digging.

The other disks seems fairly normal, at least.

--D
> 
> 						- Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux