Bad flexbg_overhead calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I was running the "f_random_corruption" test during a build (patches
posted long ago), which formats filesystems with semi-random parameters,
and then
corrupts it and sees if e2fsck can fix it.  In this case, it failed during
mke2fs, but without any obvious reason:

./misc/mke2fs -j -t ext4 -b 4096 -I 1024 -O
sparse_super,filetype,dir_index,resize_inode -F /tmp/tt 79106
mke2fs 1.42.11 (09-Jul-2014)
Creating regular file /tmp/tt
/tmp/tt: Invalid argument passed to ext2 library while setting up
superblock



It looks like this is caused by the following check in ext2fs_initialize():

        flexbg_overhead = super->s_first_data_block + 1 +
		fs->desc_blocks + super->s_reserved_gdt_blocks +
		(__u64)flexbg_size * (2 + fs->inode_blocks_per_group);

	/*
	 * Disallow creating ext4 which breaks flex_bg metadata layout
	 * obviously.
	 */
	if (flexbg_overhead > ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)) {
		retval = EXT2_ET_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
		goto cleanup;
	}

I suspect the reason it is failing is due to "-I 1024", which is creating
large inodes with extra xattr space, and this is confusing the flexbg
check, though I don't think this should be considered an invalid option?


Cheers, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Dilger

Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux