On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:06:19PM +0400, Azat Khuzhin wrote: > > AFAIR it was against master. > Yeah massive rename will do a lot of conflicts, I've just rebased them > against maint without first patch and sent new patchset (v3). Great, thanks! For future information, if you are doing development, it's better to use either the maint branch (for bug fixes) or the next branch. The next branch is non-rewinding, so it's safe to do development against it, and it's generally a few days ahead of the master branch, especially after I've added a large number of patches. he basic idea is that if there are some end users which are using e2fsprogs' master branch, while any patches that get merged into "next" should be clean and safe and Bug Free(tm), that we give those patches a few days for people to find bugs and really obvious/stupid flaws that either (a) I made or that (b) I missed in my review before those new commits "graduate" to master. Cheers, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
