On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:19:32AM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
>
> Thanks for the reply, sorry for responding late.
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:21:34PM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> >> Sorry Ted, if it caused the confusion.
> >>
> >> There were actually 2 parts to the problem, the logs in the first mail
> >> were from the original situation – where in there were many block
> >> groups and error prints also showed that.
> >>
> >> EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:742: group 1493, 0
> >> clusters in bitmap, 58339 in gd
> >> EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:742: group 1000, 0
> >> clusters in bitmap, 3 in gd
> >> EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:742: group 1425, 0
> >> clusters in bitmap, 1 in gd
> >> JBD2: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sda1, blocknr = 0). There's
> >> a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> >> JBD2: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sda1, blocknr = 0). There's
> >> a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> >>
> >> 1) Original case – when the disk got corrupted and we only had the
> >> logs and the hung task messages. But not the HDD on which issue was
> >> observed.
> >> 2) In order to reproduce the problem as was coming through the logs
> >> (which highlighted the problem in the bitmap corruption). To minimize
> >> the environment and make a proper case, we created a smaller partition
> >> size and with only 2 groups. And intentionally corrupted the group 1
> >> (our intention was just to replicate the error scenario).
> >
> > I'm assuming that the original broken fs simply had a corrupt block bitmap, and
> > that the dd thing was just to simulate that corruption in a testing
> > environment?
>
> Yes, we did so in order to replicate the error scenario.
> >
> >> 3) After corruption we used ‘fsstress’ - we got the similar problem
> >> as was coming the original logs. – We shared our analysis after this
> >> point for looping in the writepages part the free blocks mismatch.
> >
> > Hm. I tried it with 3.15-rc1 and didn't see any hangs. Corrupt bitmaps shut
> > down allocations from the block group and the FS continues, as expected.
> >
> We are using kernel version 3.8, so cannot switch to 3.15-rc1. It is a
> limitation currently.
>
> >> 4) We came across ‘Darrick’ patches(in which it also mentioned about
> >> how to corrupt to reproduce the problem) and applied on our
> >> environment. It solved the initial problem about the looping in
> >> writepages, but now we got hangs at other places.
> >
> > There are hundreds of Darrick patches ... to which one are you referring? :)
> > (What was the subject line?)
> >
> ext4: error out if verifying the block bitmap fails
> ext4: fix type declaration of ext4_validate_block_bitmap
> ext4: mark block group as corrupt on block bitmap error
> ext4: mark block group as corrupt on inode bitmap error
> ext4: mark group corrupt on group descriptor checksum
> ext4: don't count free clusters from a corrupt block group
Ok, thank you for clarifying. :)
> So, the patches helps in marking the block group as corrupt and avoids
> further allocation. But when we consider the normal write path using
> write_begin. Since, there is mismatch between the free cluster count
> from the group descriptor and the bitmap. In that case it marks the
> pages dirty by copying dirty but later it get ENOSPC from the
> writepages when it actually does the allocation.
>
> So, our doubt is if we are marking the block group as corrupt, we
> should also subtract the block group count from the
> s_freeclusters_counter. This will make sure we have the valid
> freecluster count and error ‘ENOSPC’ can be returned from the
> write_begin, instead of propagating such paths till the writepages.
>
> We made change like this:
>
> @@ -737,14 +737,18 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_buddy(struct super_block *sb,
> grp->bb_fragments = fragments;
>
> if (free != grp->bb_free) {
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
> ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, group, 0, 0,
> "%u clusters in bitmap, %u in gd; "
> "block bitmap corrupt.",
> free, grp->bb_free);
> /*
> * If we intend to continue, we consider group descriptor
> * corrupt and update bb_free using bitmap value
> */
> + percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter, grp->bb_free);
> grp->bb_free = free;
> set_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT_BIT, &grp->bb_state);
> }
> mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, grp);
>
> Is this the correct method? Or are missing something in this? Please
> share your opinion.
I think this looks ok. If you send a proper patch doing this to the mailing
list, I'll officially review it.
> >> Using ‘tune2fs’ is not a viable solution in our case, we can only
> >> provide the solution via. the kernel changes. So, we made the changes
> >> as shared earlier.
> >
> > Would it help if you could set errors=remount-ro in mke2fs?
> >
> Sorry, we cannot reformat or use tune2fs to change the ‘errors’ value.
I apologize, my question was unclear; what I meant to ask is, would it have
been helpful if you could have set errors=remount-ro back when you ran mke2fs?
Now that the format's been done, I suppose the only recourse is mount -o
remount,errors=remount-ro (online) or tune2fs (offline).
--D
>
> > --D
> >> So the question isn't how the file system got corrupted, but that
> >> you'd prefer that the system recovers without hanging after this
> >> corruption.
> >> >> Yes, our priority is to keep the system running.
> >>
> >> Again, Sorry for the confusion. But the intention was just to show the
> >> original problem and what we did in order to replicate the problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks & Regards,
> >> Amit Sahrawat
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:30:10AM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> >> >> 4) Corrupt the block group ‘1’ by writing all ‘1’, we had one file
> >> >> with all 1’s, so using ‘dd’ –
> >> >> dd if=i_file of=/dev/sdb1 bs=4096 seek=17 count=1
> >> >> After this mount the partition – create few random size files and then
> >> >> ran ‘fsstress,
> >> >
> >> > Um, sigh. You didn't say that you were deliberately corrupting the
> >> > file system. That wasn't in the subject line, or anywhere else in the
> >> > original message.
> >> >
> >> > So the question isn't how the file system got corrupted, but that
> >> > you'd prefer that the system recovers without hanging after this
> >> > corruption.
> >> >
> >> > I wish you had *said* that. It would have saved me a lot of time,
> >> > since I was trying to figure out how the system had gotten so
> >> > corrupted (not realizing you had deliberately corrupted the file
> >> > system).
> >> >
> >> > So I think if you run "tune2fs -e remount-ro /dev/sdb1" before you
> >> > started the fsstress, the file system would have remounted the
> >> > filesystem read-only at the first EXT4-fs error message. This would
> >> > avoid the hang that you saw, since the file system would hopefully
> >> > "failed fast", before th euser had the opportunity to put data into
> >> > the page cache that would be lost when the system discovered there was
> >> > no place to put the data.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > - Ted
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
