Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zheng,

Thanks so much for your deep and detailed work on this.

I have two immediate reactions.

1) We should first fix __ext4_es_shrink so that we interpret
nr_to_scan correctly --- it's the number of objects to scan, not the
number of objects that we need to shirnk.  That should significantly
reduce the number of scans that we do, and fixing this could
potentially influence the metrics that we measure.

2) In addition to measuring the scan time, we should also measure how
many times we end up loading extents from disk when (during the course
of a normal workload) we are under memory pressure, and RR ends up
throwing out an extent that would have been saved in LRU, and so an
additional metadata read would be required when using RR.

	   	    	       	  	   - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux