In ext4_es_can_be_merged() when checking whether we can merge two
extents we should use EXT_MAX_BLOCKS instead of defining it manually.
Also if it is really the case we should notify userspace because clearly
there is a bug in extent status tree implementation since this should
never happen.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 3c47b4e..b38d71a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -344,8 +344,14 @@ static int ext4_es_can_be_merged(struct extent_status *es1,
if (ext4_es_status(es1) != ext4_es_status(es2))
return 0;
- if (((__u64) es1->es_len) + es2->es_len > 0xFFFFFFFFULL)
+ if (((__u64) es1->es_len) + es2->es_len > EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) {
+ pr_warn("ES assertion failed when merging extents. "
+ "The sum of lengths of es1 (%d) and es2 (%d) "
+ "is bigger than allowed file size (%d)\n",
+ es1->es_len, es2->es_len, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
+ WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
+ }
if (((__u64) es1->es_lblk) + es1->es_len != es2->es_lblk)
return 0;
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
