Re: Ext4 test failures -- COLLAPSE_RANGE and ZERO_RANGE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-04-04 3:47 GMT+09:00, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>:
> Hi Lukas, Namjae,
>
> During final testing, I found two problems.  One is that the mount
> option dioread_nolock is causing a test failure for ext4/001, which is
> a ZERO_RANGE test.
>
> The other is that the mount option data=journal is cuasing a test
> failure for shared/002 and shared/004, which are COLLAPSE_RANGE bugs.
>
> Since these aren't regressions, and I don't think these new fallocate
> modes will probably be widely used at least initially, I don't think
> it's worth it to drop these two patches, especialy since we've done
> all of our testing for this merge window with the tests present.
> However, I'd really appreicate it if you take a look at them.
Hi Ted.
Sorry about this bug.
I will look into collapse range issue with data=journal.
And I'll also check more carefully insert range patch with the way you guided.

Thanks!
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux