On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:06:22AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I noticed a few things while merging -next into my dev tree... Darrick, good catch! > > + retval = ext2fs_new_inode(current_fs, cwd, 010755, 0, &newfile); > > + if (retval) { > > + com_err(__func__, retval, 0); > > + close(fd); > > + return errno; > > Why return errno here, instead of retval? Yep, we should do s/errno/retval/ at the places that you noted. Robert, since these are in next already, could you submit a patch to fixt this up? Thanks!! - Ted P.S. Fortunately, this isn't crypto code ala gnutls. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html