Re: [PATCH] tune2fs: allow removal of dirty journal with two "-f" options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:08:11PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jim pointed out that "tune2fs -f -O ^has_journal" won't remove the
> journal if the needs_recovery flag is set; the manpage seems to indicate
> that it should.  And if you've lost an external journal and can no longer
> replay it, how should one proceed?
> 
> Change tune2fs so that two "-f" options will allow removal of a dirty
> journal from a filesystem, even if the filesystem needs recovery.
> 
> e2fsck can then do its best to pick up the pieces.
> 
> Reported-by: Jim Faulkner <james.faulkner@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux