Re: Tuxera test suite failure for setfacl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes:

>   Hello,
>
> On Wed 05-02-14 11:45:39, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> With commit c6ac12a6159c802ae8b757dd13563564e64333df we are modifying
>> the ctime of the file when changing file's permission by setfacl. The
>> commit says that is correct as per spec. But we do have a test in tuxera
>> http://tuxera.com/sw/qa/pjd-fstest-20090130-RC.tgz test/xacl/00.t 45
>> which expect the ctime to be not changed across setfacl.
>> 
>> I haven't looked at the spec myself. Can you double check and make sure
>> it is ok to change the ctime across setfacl ?
>   Well, it would be really strange if changing permissions via chmod(1)
> changed ctime but via setfacl(1) did not, don't you think?
>

That make sense. I guess we should consider this a test case error.

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux