Re: [PATCH 09/12] libext2: optimize ext2fs_new_block2()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 19, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> If there are hundreds of thousands of blocks which are in use before
> the first free block, it is much, MUCH faster to use
> ext2fs_find_first_zero_block_bitmap2() instead of searching the
> allocation bitmap bit by bit.

Excellent.  The libext2fs block allocator has typically been unusable
for filesystems with allocated blocks, so it is good to see this.

This could be further improved by skipping full groups entirely, but
that doesn't detract from the benefits of this patch.

Cheers, Andreas

> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/alloc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/alloc.c b/lib/ext2fs/alloc.c
> index 91637dd..7dcfd3c 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/alloc.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/alloc.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_new_inode(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t dir,
> errcode_t ext2fs_new_block2(ext2_filsys fs, blk64_t goal,
> 			   ext2fs_block_bitmap map, blk64_t *ret)
> {
> -	blk64_t	i;
> -	int	c_ratio;
> +	errcode_t retval;
> +	blk64_t	b;
> 
> 	EXT2_CHECK_MAGIC(fs, EXT2_ET_MAGIC_EXT2FS_FILSYS);
> 
> @@ -148,21 +148,21 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_new_block2(ext2_filsys fs, blk64_t goal,
> 		return EXT2_ET_NO_BLOCK_BITMAP;
> 	if (!goal || (goal >= ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)))
> 		goal = fs->super->s_first_data_block;
> -	i = goal;
> -	c_ratio = 1 << ext2fs_get_bitmap_granularity(map);
> -	if (c_ratio > 1)
> -		goal &= ~EXT2FS_CLUSTER_MASK(fs);
> -	do {
> -		if (!ext2fs_fast_test_block_bitmap2(map, i)) {
> -			clear_block_uninit(fs, ext2fs_group_of_blk2(fs, i));
> -			*ret = i;
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -		i = (i + c_ratio) & ~(c_ratio - 1);
> -		if (i >= ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super))
> -			i = fs->super->s_first_data_block;
> -	} while (i != goal);
> -	return EXT2_ET_BLOCK_ALLOC_FAIL;
> +	goal &= ~EXT2FS_CLUSTER_MASK(fs);
> +
> +	retval = ext2fs_find_first_zero_block_bitmap2(map,
> +			goal, ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super) - 1, &b);
> +	if ((retval == ENOENT) && (goal != fs->super->s_first_data_block))
> +		retval = ext2fs_find_first_zero_block_bitmap2(map,
> +			fs->super->s_first_data_block, goal - 1, &b);
> +	if (retval == ENOENT)
> +		return EXT2_ET_BLOCK_ALLOC_FAIL;
> +	if (retval)
> +		return retval;
> +
> +	clear_block_uninit(fs, ext2fs_group_of_blk2(fs, b));
> +	*ret = b;
> +	return 0;
> }
> 
> errcode_t ext2fs_new_block(ext2_filsys fs, blk_t goal,
> -- 
> 1.8.5.rc3.362.gdf10213
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux