This is harmless, since ext4_walk_page_buffers only passes the handle onto the callback function, and in this call site the function in question, bput_one(), doesn't actually use the handle. But there's no point passing in an invalid handle, and it creates a Coverity warning, so let's just clean it up. Addresses-Coverity-Id: #1091168 Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 8454ebe..f33b4eb 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int __ext4_journalled_writepage(struct page *page, ret = err; if (!ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) - ext4_walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0, len, + ext4_walk_page_buffers(NULL, page_bufs, 0, len, NULL, bput_one); ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_JDATA); out: -- 1.8.5.rc3.362.gdf10213 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
