[PATCH] ext4: fix bigalloc regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with
the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize).  It causes xfstests
generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and
transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state.
Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well.

The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster
offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks().

Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 4410cc3..3384dc4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4218,7 +4218,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	 */
 	map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER;
 	newex.ee_block = cpu_to_le32(map->m_lblk);
-	cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_CMASK(sbi, map->m_lblk);
+	cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, map->m_lblk);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we are doing bigalloc, check to see if the extent returned
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux