On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:07:09PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hmm, I'll try to reproduce it here; which test is failing? > > It's possible that I fubar'd the ordering when I resorted the patches just > prior to sending them out. :/ It's failing when I apply this patch against both maint and next, so you may be quite right that it's commit ordering issue. The failing test was t_quota_2off; it looks like punch wasn't adjusting the block bitmap correctly? - Ted tune2fs 1.43-WIP (8-Jul-2013) e2fsck 1.43-WIP (8-Jul-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(12--15) Fix? yes Free blocks count wrong for group #0 (84, counted=88). Fix? yes Free blocks count wrong (84, counted=88). Fix? yes /tmp/e2fsprogs-tmp.fMP6jN: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** /tmp/e2fsprogs-tmp.fMP6jN: 11/64 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 12/100 blocks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
