On 10/23/13 10:22 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:51:48AM -0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: >> Hey Eric, >> >> I did a test here building the e2fsprogs -next tree without quota support and I >> didn't have any problems configuring and compiling it. Can you share the test >> you did and failed? >> > > I've been able to replicate the problem. You may need to rm -rf your > build directory and then run from scratch to see it. yes, make clean doesn't remove it, even git clean doesn't; it's in .gitignore (why?) > Sorry for not responding sooner; I'm in Edinburgh this week and in > conference mode. no problem, I guess that's why I asked :) > The reason why we have continud building libquota even when libsupport > is not defined is because the plan is to rename libquota to libsupport > once 1.42.x is released. Libquota/libsupport is desinged to never be > built as a shared library, and the idea is to move things like > e2fsck/profile.c which is used by e2fsck and mke2fs, into libsupport. > The rational for that is that the functions in libquota are already > horribly e2fsprogs specific and aren't really set up to be usable as a > generic quota support library. So we might as well make it be a > standardized place for internal support functions used by multiple > e2fsprogs programs. > > I'll try to find a fix that minimizes deltas between the maint branch > and the next branch. Maybe just revert part of "quota: fix disabling quota, add quota tests" ? Did that actually do more good than harm? -Eric > Cheers, > > - Ted > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
