Re: [PATCH 21/31] libext2fs: Be more thorough in searching a range of blocks for a cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:28:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> implied_cluster_alloc() is written such that if the the user passes in a
> logical block that is the zeroth block in a logical cluster (lblk %
> cluster_ratio == 0), then it will assume that there is no physical cluster
> mapped to any other part of the logical cluster.
> 
> This is not true if we happen to be allocating logical blocks in reverse order.
> Therefore, search the whole cluster, except for the lblk that we passed in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux