On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:27:40PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > During a punch operation, if we decide to delete an extent out of the extent > tree, the subsequent extents are moved on top of the current extent (that is to > say, they're memmmove'd down one slot). Therefore it is not correct to advance > to the next leaf because that means we miss half the extents in the range! > Rereading the current pointer should be fine. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. BTW, in the future, this is the sort of change where creating a regression test would be highly appreciated --- especially since you presumably had to create test cases while you were creating the patch, so it's much less effort to encapsulate it into a test case while developing the patch. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html