On 9/10/13 2:33 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > On 9/10/13 2:06 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:44:10PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >>> ext4 exports per-filesystem information via sysfs. The lifetime rules >>> have historically been painful for this but the solution has been to pair >>> the kobject with a completion and call complete in the kobject's >>> release function. >>> >>> Since this is a pattern I've used in btrfs as well, it makes sense to >>> turn the pairing into a convenience structure with a standard API. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/linux/kobj_completion.h | 18 +++++++++++++++ >>> lib/kobject.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+) >>> >>> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 >>> +++ b/include/linux/kobj_completion.h 2013-09-10 12:58:03.530554144 -0400 >>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ >>> +#ifndef _KOBJ_COMPLETION_H_ >>> +#define _KOBJ_COMPLETION_H_ >>> + >>> +#include <linux/kobject.h> >>> +#include <linux/completion.h> >>> + >>> +struct kobj_completion { >>> + struct kobject kc_kobj; >>> + struct completion kc_unregister; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#define kobj_to_kobj_completion(kobj) \ >>> + container_of(kobj, struct kobj_completion, kc_kobj) >>> + >>> +void kobj_completion_init(struct kobj_completion *kc, struct kobj_type *ktype); >>> +void kobj_completion_release(struct kobject *kobj); >>> +void kobj_completion_del_and_wait(struct kobj_completion *kc); >>> +#endif /* _KOBJ_COMPLETION_H_ */ >>> --- a/lib/kobject.c 2013-09-10 12:57:54.198666613 -0400 >>> +++ b/lib/kobject.c 2013-09-10 13:16:31.750607946 -0400 >>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ >>> */ >>> >>> #include <linux/kobject.h> >>> +#include <linux/kobj_completion.h> >>> #include <linux/string.h> >>> #include <linux/export.h> >>> #include <linux/stat.h> >>> @@ -711,6 +712,52 @@ const struct sysfs_ops kobj_sysfs_ops = >>> }; >>> >>> /** >>> + * kobj_completion_init - initialize a kobj_completion object. >>> + * @kc: kobj_completion >>> + * @ktype: type of kobject to initialize >>> + * >>> + * kobj_completion structures can be embedded within structures with different >>> + * lifetime rules. During the release of the enclosing object, we can >>> + * wait on the release of the kobject so that we don't free it while it's >>> + * still busy. >>> + */ >>> +void kobj_completion_init(struct kobj_completion *kc, struct kobj_type *ktype) >>> +{ >>> + init_completion(&kc->kc_unregister); >>> + kobject_init(&kc->kc_kobj, ktype); >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kobj_completion_init); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * kobj_completion_release - release a kobj_completion object >>> + * @kobj: kobject embedded in kobj_completion >>> + * >>> + * Used with kobject_release to notify waiters that the kobject has been >>> + * released. >>> + */ >>> +void kobj_completion_release(struct kobject *kobj) >>> +{ >>> + struct kobj_completion *kc = kobj_to_kobj_completion(kobj); >>> + complete(&kc->kc_unregister); >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kobj_completion_release); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * kobj_completion_del_and_wait - release the kobject and wait for it >>> + * @kc: kobj_completion object to release >>> + * >>> + * Delete the kobject from sysfs and drop the reference count. Then wait >>> + * until any outstanding references are also dropped. >>> + */ >>> +void kobj_completion_del_and_wait(struct kobj_completion *kc) >>> +{ >>> + kobject_del(&kc->kc_kobj); >>> + kobject_put(&kc->kc_kobj); >> >> Why the extra kobject_put() call? Who added this extra reference to the >> object? > > There's an assumption that kobject_add will have been called on the > initialized kobject. If it hasn't been called, the object can just be > deleted without the completion. It makes the calling code easier to > read, so would it work for you if I documented that assumption in > _del_and_wait? Actually, that's not it. The refcounting works out in my tests. The kobject's refcount is initialized to 1. kobject_add doesn't increment it and kobject_del doesn't decrement it. So we need the kobject_put to trigger the release function. Or am I missing something here? -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature