Hi Al, On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:36:13AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 08:14:05PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > After applied this patch, the problem has been fixed in my own sand box. > > But that would be great if you could give it a try. I want to make sure > > that this patch can fix the problem. It looks like there has the same > > problem in ext3. So if this patch is fine, I will generate a patch for > > ext3 file system. > > Nice catch, and you have my ACK. Which tree do you prefer that to go > through? vfs and ext4 are the obvious candidates... Now ext4 tree has not yet rebased against 3.11-rcX. So it seems that vfs tree is better if we want to fix this bug in mainline kernel as soon as possible. This patch is against mainline kernel. I think it should be applied into vfs tree cleanly. Please let me know if I need to rebase it against vfs tree. BTW, the patch for ext3 file system will be sent out soon. Please pick it up. Thanks, - Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html