On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:47:12AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > On 07/09/2013 08:11 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: > > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently ext4_add_dirent_to_inline() function returns 1 to indicate > > that a new directory entry has been added. But it sounds reasonable > > to return 0 in this function. Meanwhile we also can eliminate a if > > statement in ext4_add_entry() function when a directory entry has added > > correctly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx> > > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/ext4/inline.c | 2 +- > > fs/ext4/namei.c | 6 +----- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c > > index b8a0746..5a27d32 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c > > @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static int ext4_add_dirent_to_inline(handle_t *handle, > > ext4_update_dx_flag(dir); > > dir->i_version++; > > ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, dir); > > - return 1; > > + return 0; > > } > > > > static void *ext4_get_inline_xattr_pos(struct inode *inode, > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c > > index ab2f6dc..2a6a736 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c > > @@ -1901,12 +1901,8 @@ static int ext4_add_entry(handle_t *handle, struct dentry *dentry, > > > > if (ext4_has_inline_data(dir)) { > > retval = ext4_try_add_inline_entry(handle, dentry, inode); > > - if (retval < 0) > > + if (retval <= 0) > Sorry, I guess you misread the codes here. If we get 0 here, it means > that ext4_try_add_inline_entry can't add this entry into the inline > data, but there is no error, so please go on with the normal case. "1" > means we have successfully done the work. So your change is wrong. Ah, you are right. Thanks for pointing it out. - Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html