Re: [RFC 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:24:19AM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>On Sat, 4 May 2013, Radek Pazdera wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat,  4 May 2013 23:28:33 +0200
>> From: Radek Pazdera <rpazdera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx, kasparek@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>     Radek Pazdera <rpazdera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [RFC 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index
>
>Hi Radek,
>
>patches do not apply cleanly any more on the ext4 dev branch. Can
>you rebase and resend the whole patch set ?

Hi Lukas,

I tried the patches with the dev branch of

    http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/

and they seem to apply cleanly. Is that the correct tree?

This thread contains the older version of the patches, the rebased
version should be in the thread called:

    [RFC v2 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index
    http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/38697

-Radek

>Thanks!
>-Lukas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux