Re: [PATCH 1/6] jbd2: optimize jbd2_journal_force_commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:07:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:16:38PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > Ok, sound reasonable. In fact __jbd2_journal_force_commit() should be
> > static so misuse is no likely to happen.
> >
> > >   Also if we move the WARN_ON(!current->journal_info) here, we can remove
> > > the 'nested' argument.
> > Also agree. Will send you with updated version soon.
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> Have you had a chance to work on an updated version of this series
> with Jan's requested changes?
Yes. It is ready, but since Jan is on vacations till 20'th I thought
it is useless to send it before that date. Am I right?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 					- Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux