On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:07:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Doh, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for correcting me. I was > seeing a failure in xfstest 091 (fsx using direct IO) with dioread_nolock > and I thought the missing flush was the culprit (as fsx saw non-zeros in > the tail of the page that was truncated). After adding the flush I didn't > see it anymore. But now I'm not able to trigger the failure again > regardless whether the patch is applied or not. So Ted, please drop the > patch and I'll watch out if I ever see the failure again. Dropped. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
