Hi Eric, Thanks for reporting it. On 03/16/2013 06:28 AM, Eric Whitney wrote: > I'm seeing Xfstest 285 consistently fail for the 1k test case using the > latest dev branch while running on both x86 and ARM. Subtest 08 is > the problem. From the test output: > > 08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages > 08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 4194304, got 11264. FAIL > 08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 4194304, got 11264. FAIL > 08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 10240 or 10240, got 0. FAIL > 08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 10240 or 10240, got 1. FAIL > > From previous discussions, we expect 285 to fail in the ext3 (nodelalloc, > no flex_bg, and no extents) test case, but in subtest 07. It still does > that. Sorry, my latest patch doesn't finish yet. > > In the dev branch, reverting 4f42f80a8f - "ext4: use s_extent_max_zeroout_kb > value as number of kb" - results in success for 285 in the 1k test case. Presumably this patch isn't root cause. I suspect there are some bugs in ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff(). I will check it. Thanks, - Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
