Re: [REGRESSION] allocated N with only M reserved metadata blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:02:01PM -0400, Eric Whitney wrote:
> 
> FWIW, this might not be a regression.  I believe I've got this warning in my
> testing logs from both 3.8 and 3.8-rc7 (commit 01a523eb51 in 3.9-rc1 affects
> message format and line numbering) on both x86 and ARM.  I didn't run xfstest
> 127 prior to 3.8-rc7, so I don't know how far back the warning may have
> occurred for that particular test.
> 
> The 3.8-rc7 results are a little different with respect to number of warnings
> and test cases, so I'm thinking this one isn't completely deterministic,
> testing-wise.  Multiple test runs may be required to see it.

Thanks for the extra data; this saved be a whole bunch of time, since
I probably would have started doing a series git bisects tonight.   :-)

  	   	      	      	      - Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux