Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: fix flag settings in e2image.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Tomas Racek wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:06:58 +0100
> > From: Tomas Racek <tracek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Tomas Racek <tracek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: fix flag settings in e2image.h
> > 
> > This prevents from SIGSEGV when -s options is used.
> 
> oops! Thanks for catching that. I just wonder why the regression
> test is not catching that ?

Well, it seems that "-s" option is not tested (or even used). I'll try to fix at least the first thing. ;-)

Tom

> 
> 
> you can add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  lib/ext2fs/e2image.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/e2image.h b/lib/ext2fs/e2image.h
> > index c918529..5537980 100644
> > --- a/lib/ext2fs/e2image.h
> > +++ b/lib/ext2fs/e2image.h
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> >  /* Image flags */
> >  #define E2IMAGE_INSTALL_FLAG	1
> >  #define E2IMAGE_SCRAMBLE_FLAG	2
> > -#define E2IMAGE_IS_QCOW2_FLAG	3
> > +#define E2IMAGE_IS_QCOW2_FLAG	4
> >  
> >  struct ext2_image_hdr {
> >  	__u32	magic_number;	/* This must be EXT2_ET_MAGIC_E2IMAGE */
> > 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux