* Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@xxxxxxxxx>: <snip> > > BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21 > > 15:41:27 EST 2013 > > Ran: 001 002 005 006 007 011 013 014 015 020 053 062 068 069 070 074 075 076 > > 077 079 083 088 089 091 100 105 112 113 117 120 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 > > 130 131 132 133 135 141 169 184 192 193 198 204 207 208 209 210 211 212 215 > > 219 221 224 225 226 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 239 240 245 246 247 248 > > 249 257 258 263 269 270 271 272 273 275 277 280 285 289 294 > > Failures: 125 285 > > END TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21 > > 17:24:32 EST 2013 > > > > Xfstest 285 fails reliably for me on both ARM and x86-64 and only in this test > > scenario. I see the same failure on 3.7, so it's not a regression (however, > > this failure doesn't appear in Ted's early 3.8-rc results). > > > > --- 285.out 2013-02-19 15:58:25.110665500 -0500 > > +++ 285.out.bad 2013-02-21 17:23:45.156519882 -0500 > > @@ -1 +1,3 @@ > > QA output created by 285 > > +seek sanity check failed! > > This test case is used to test seek data/hole feature. After 3.8 ext4 > has supported it. But it will fail without extents feature because > indirect-based file haven't unwritten extent. Please check 285.full > file, and you will see that test07 fails. > > BTW, I am trying to fix this problem for xfstests. > > Regards, > - Zheng > Hi Zheng: Thanks very much for your explanation and reminder - it is indeed test07 that fails. I'm looking forward to testing your fix when it's ready. Regards, Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
