From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Because it is no doubt 'start_blk + count < start_blk' always comes to
false. It is useless to have this check,remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 3f11656..5ffce82 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -226,7 +226,6 @@ int ext4_data_block_valid(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
struct rb_node *n = sbi->system_blks.rb_node;
if ((start_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
- (start_blk + count < start_blk) ||
(start_blk + count > ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
sbi->s_es->s_last_error_block = cpu_to_le64(start_blk);
return 0;
-- 1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
