On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:25:14AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > This patch makes me consider my patches that dump a sparse file in > debugfs. In my patch [1] llseek64(2) is called to seek to the next > data in target file. So I believe ext2fs_llseek() is a better choice. > I am happy to send a newer patch to fix it. What do you think? > > 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg36134.html You're right, we should use ext2fs_llseek() for better portability. Thanks, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
