On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:24:37PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:45:42PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > When using indirect blocks there is no possibility to have any unwritten > > extents. So wait for them in ext4_ind_direct_IO() is just bogus. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Hi Jan, > > Just for the note, this patch conflicts with my patch set of extent > status tree. I guess your patch series will be applied before my patch > set. So I will rebase my patch set against the latest kernel. :-) Actually, the extent status tree patches are already in my tree, although I'm still testing and reviewing them. so they haven't been finalized yet (which is why I haven't sent an e-mail ack). If the conflict is minor, I'll take care of it. If it's non-trivial, I'll yell for help. :-) - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
