Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Use redirty_page_for_writepage() in ext4_bio_write_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 17-01-13 13:35:01, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > When we cannot write a page we should use redirty_page_for_writepage()
> > instead of plain set_page_dirty(). That tells writeback code we have
> > problems, redirties only the page (redirtying buffers is not needed),
> > and updates mm accounting of failed page writes.
> > 
> > Also move clearing of buffer dirty flag after io_submit_add_bh(). At that
> > moment we are sure buffer will be going to disk.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This sounds like a bug fix, not just a clean up.  Do you think the
  Yes, it's a bug fix.

> impact of not using redirty_page_for_writeback() is bad enough that we
> should add a cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx tag?  As I recall, not doing
> this would end up leaving the page flags and radix tree to be
> inconsistent, right?
  No, it shouldn't cause any such serious harm. Just writeback may retry
writing the inode immediately (it backs off if it sees skipped pages) which
could result in needless spinning. Also some mm/bdi statistics will get
slightly off. But all in all I don't think it's a stable material.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux