On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 03:38:58PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 08:30:15PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > +errcode_t ext2fs_file_read2(ext2_file_t file, void *buf,
> > + unsigned int wanted, unsigned int *got,
> > + ext2_off64_t *seek)
>
> I'm a bit concenred about this abstraction. Consider what happens if
> wanted is greater than a block size --- for example, consider if
> wanted is 16k, and every other 1k block is uninitialized.
Hi Ted,
I wonder why wanted is 16k. If a program calls ext2fs_file_read()
function, seek will be 0 and SEEK flag won't be marked. The behavior of
ext2fs_file_read() is the same as before. If ext2fs_file_read2() is
called by dump_file(), seek won't be 0 and wanted is always equal to
block size. That is why I fix the hard-coded buffer length in dump_file().
If I miss something, please let me know.
Thanks,
- Zheng
>
> Then ext2fs_file_read2() will return *got set to 8k, and *seek set to
> 8k, and the buffer will contain the blocks that are initialized packed
> up right against each other.
>
> Worse, ext2fs_file_read() will do the same thing, so this commit
> changes how ext2fs_file_read() functions, and a program which expects
> to get the correct contents from the file will malfunction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
