Hi, sorry my delayed answer on this thread. > >Anyway, back to my main point: As a guiding principle I think I would > >say that mount -t ext3 with ext4.ko should hard-reject any option not > >understood by ext3.ko. It's clear and predictable, and should make for > >a decent first cut. > > > >-Eric > > Agreed (sounds almost like we had coordinated our answers before I > spoke to Ted in Barcelona!). > > Ric > that's my main point, and the goal of my first patch. I was thinking in just warn when mounting a ext3 with ext4.ko using mount options not recognized by ext3.ko, but, looks like hard-reject these options looks more reasonable than just warning. I'm going to re-write the patch using this approach. Is there any concern in take this direction from any part here? -- Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
