On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:32:54PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > There are some places in ext4_fill_super() where we would not return > proper error code if something fails. The confusion is caused probably > due to the fact that we have two "kind-of" return variables 'ret'and > 'err'. > > 'ret' is used to return error code from ext4_fill_super() where err is > used to store return values from other functions within ext4_fill_super(). > However some places were missing the obligatory 'ret = err'. We could > put the assignment where it is missing, but we can have better "future > proof" solution. Or we could convert the code to use just one, but it > would require more rewrites. > > This commit fixes the problem by returning value from 'err' variable if > it is set and 'ret' otherwise in error handling branch of the > ext4_fill_super(). The reasoning is that 'ret' value is often set to > default "-EINVAL" or explicit value, where 'err' is used to store > return value from other functions and should be otherwise zero. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
