Question on resize2fs with "combination of flex_bg and !resize_inode"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ted,

Regarding this patch to resize2fs: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/7379

In reading the comment, I was wondering if this problem scenario can also happen when shrinking an ext4 filesystem with this combination of features, or if it is only likely to be a problem when growing it?

Thank you,
Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux